Infants who share a bed with other children are at a higher risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) than are other infants, according to a new analysis of a study of mostly African-American SIDS deaths in Chicago.
The report appears in the medical journal Pediatrics.
The analysis also found that two known risk factors for SIDS - sleeping on soft bedding and sleeping on the stomach - pose a far greater risk of SIDS when they occur together than the sum of both risk factors added together.
Developing Greater Understanding
The report confirms several studies reporting that SIDS risk was lower among infants put to bed with a pacifier and reinforced earlier findings that sleeping on a sofa also increases infants' risk of SIDS.
The study was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), both at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The researchers studied all infants from the ages of birth to one year who had died of SIDS in Chicago between November 1993 and April 1996. There were 260 SIDS deaths during that time.
"This study provides important new information regarding SIDS risk factors," said Dr. Duane Alexander, Director of the NICHD. "The next step is to get this information to the parents and families who can use it to reduce the risk of SIDS among their own infants."
According to CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding, "The SIDS rate for African-American babies is more than twice that for white infants. Families need counseling on ways to reduce the risk of SIDS. For example, they need to know they should avoid putting an infant to sleep with other children."
The research is part of the Chicago Infant Mortality Study, designed to identify risk factors for SIDS that place African-American infants at roughly double the SIDS risk of Caucasians.
"Our study found a dramatic increase in SIDS risk for prone sleeping on soft surfaces, highlighting the need to eliminate these unsafe sleep practices," said Dr. Fern R. Hauck, lead investigator of the study. "Additionally, infants should never be placed to sleep on a couch with anyone or in a bed with other children."
Getting the Word Out
The study authors conclude that physicians should counsel new parents not only about the benefits of placing infants to sleep on their backs, but also about the risk their study had uncovered.
"Parents are influenced strongly by their physicians in choosing the sleep position for their infants," they wrote. "Other infant care practices, such as bed sharing and use of soft bedding, may also be influenced by medical providers, particularly if reinforced by the media."
To reduce the racial disparity in SIDS rates, the authors advised taking families' economic circumstances into consideration. For example, some parents may not be able to afford firmer mattresses or to have enough beds for all their family members. The authors called for research on how best to meet these needs.
"On the basis of the findings of this study, they [parents] should receive instruction that emphasizes supine (on the back) sleeping, firm bedding, not using pillows, and not sharing a bed with other children or sleeping with another person on a sofa, while being sensitive to parental concerns and cultural traditions."
The researchers noted that sleeping on the stomach, and sleeping on soft bedding - both known to increase the risk of SIDS independently - posed a much greater risk for SIDS when occurring together than might be expected.
For example, soft bedding appeared to pose 5 times the risk of SIDS as firm bedding; sleeping on the stomach increased the risk of SIDS 2.4 times. Yet infants who slept stomach down on soft bedding had 21 times the risk of SIDS as infants who slept on the back on firm bedding.
Always consult your child's physician for more information.
Children's Juice Intake Adds Extra Calories
"Parents think that because fruit juices are natural that they are a healthy drink, so they don't put a limit on how much their children consume," says study author Dr. Sarita Dhuper, director of pediatric cardiology and the pediatric obesity clinic at the Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center.
In truth, however, Dhuper says fruit drinks are a major source of calories on their own. Moreover, she says, their high sugar content may increase a child's appetite for even greater amounts of food, thus further contributing to weight gain.
"Our study found that juice consumption is almost shocking. For some kids, there seems to be no limit to what they can drink in a given day," says Dhuper, who presented her findings at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies.
Pediatric nutritionist Pam Birkenfeld agrees with the finding.
"Parents tend to think that because fruit juice is fat-free and comes from nature, it's OK," she says. "But what they often don't realize is that it is a very concentrated source of calories that generally does not fill you up, just out," says Birkenfeld, a dietician at Nassau University Medical Center in East Meadow, N.Y.
"In some obese children, juice consumption went as high as 50 ounces per day," Dhuper says. "There were just no limits."
The study calls for parents to dramatically limit their children's juice consumption, and for pediatricians to incorporate information on the links between fruit juices and obesity in all well-child visits.
Always consult your child's physician for more information.
Online Resources
(Our Organization is not responsible for the content of Internet sites.)
American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychological Association
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
National Mental Health Association